ABSTRACT
Spinal cord ischemia (SCI), a complication of acute aortic dissection, has no established treatment. Here, we report the successful management of three cases of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with SCI using a multidisciplinary approach. Case 1: A 55-year-old man presented with paraparesis due to ATAAD (non-communicating type), cardiac tamponade, and no loss of consciousness. He underwent emergency surgery for ascending aortic replacement. He awoke 3 h after the surgery; however, as his paralysis was not improved, we initiated multidisciplinary treatment with cerebrospinal drainage, continuous infusion of naloxone, and steroid pulse therapy. These treatments led to the complete resolution of his symptom; he was discharged on Day 32, with no neurological deficits. Case 2: A 50-year-old woman presented with complete paralysis of the left lower limb due to ATAAD (communicating type) but no loss of consciousness. She underwent emergency surgery for ascending aortic replacement. She awoke 2 h after the surgery; however, as her paralysis was not improved, multidisciplinary treatment with cerebrospinal drainage, continuous infusion of naloxone, and steroid pulse therapy were initiated, which led to partial resolution of the symptoms. She could walk with orthotics and was discharged on Day 57. Case 3: A 43-year-old man presented with paraparesis of the left lower limb due to ATAAD (non-communicating type). He was hemodynamically stable, with no loss of consciousness. The ATAAD was conservatively managed, and multidisciplinary treatment with cerebrospinal drainage, continuous infusion of naloxone, and steroid pulse therapy was administered. These therapies led to the complete resolution of his symptoms; he was discharged on Day 46, with no neurological deficits. Hence, for ATAAD with SCI, multidisciplinary treatment, including emergency surgery, is an important therapeutic strategy.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of proximal aortic repair (PAR) versus total arch replacement (TAR) for treatment of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD). Methods An electronic search was conducted for clinical controlled studies on PAR versus TAR for patients with ATAAD published in Medline via PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wanfang Database and CNKI since their inception up to April 30, 2022. The quality of each study included was assessed by 2 evaluators and the necessary data were extracted. STATA 16 software was used to perform statistical analysis of the available data. Results A total of 28 cohort studies involving 7 923 patients with ATAAD were included in this meta-analysis, of whom 5 710 patients received PAR and 2 213 patients underwent TAR, and 96.43% of the studies (27/28) were rated as high quality. The meta-analysis results showed that: (1) patients who underwent PAR had lower incidences of 30 d mortality [RR=0.62, 95%CI (0.50, 0.77), P<0.001], in-hospital mortality [RR=0.64, 95%CI (0.54, 0.77), P<0.001], and neurologic deficiency after surgery [RR=0.84, 95%CI (0.72, 0.98), P=0.032] than those who received TAR; (2) the cardiopulmonary bypass time [WMD=–52.07, 95%CI (–74.19, –29.94), P<0.001], circulatory arrest time [WMD=–10.14, 95%CI (–15.02, –5.26), P<0.001], and operation time [WMD=–101.68, 95%CI (–178.63, –24.73), P<0.001] were significantly shorter in PAR than those in TAR; (3) there was no statistical difference in mortality after discharge, rate of over 5-year survival, renal failure after surgery and re-intervention, volume of red blood cells transfusion and fresh-frozen plasma transfusion, or hospital stay between two surgical procedures. Conclusion Compared with TAR, PAR has a shorter operation time and lower early and in-hospital mortality, but there is no difference in long-term outcomes or complications between the two procedures for patients with ATAAD.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To summarize the efficacy of artificial blood vessel bypass grafting in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) complicated with lower extremity malperfusion.Methods:From January 2004 to January 2021, a total of 896 patients with ATAAD underwent surgical operations in Nanjing First Hospital, Among which 75 patients with lower extremity malperfusion was retrospectively analyzed.Results:There were 61 males and 14 females with mean age (50.9±11.3) years old. The cardiopulmonary bypass time (CPB) was (181.9±27.0) min, the cross-clamp time was (125.7±25.0)min, and the lower body circulatory arrest time was (20.4±3.1) min. Fifty-five patients had total aortic arch replacement and 20 cases had hemi-arch replacement surgery. Lower extremity arterial perfusion was restored in 48 patients after dissection surgery. Twenty-six patients underwent dissection surgery concurrently with extra-anatomic bypass grafting. The main postoperative complications were: acute kidney injury in 9 cases, delayed extubation (≥72 h) in 10, pulmonary infection in 13, tracheotomy in 6, paralysis in 1, stroke in 2 and lower limb amputation in 3. ICU stay time was (5.8±4.5) days, in-hospital time was (21.4±13.8) days. Nine patients (12%) died in the whole group: pulmonary infection, respiratory failure in 2 cases, multiple organ failure in 3 cases, iliac artery rupture in 1 case, intestinal necrosis in 1 case, severe cerebral infarction in 1 case, and giving-up in 1 case. A total of 66 patients (88%) were successfully discharged. The follow-up time was (55.8±33.4) months. The results of survival analysis showed that the 5-year survival rate was (96.7±4.2)%, and the 10-year survival rate was (56.4±16.3)%.Conclusion:Extra-anatomic bypass grafting is a feasible method to solve ATAAD complicated with lower extremity malperfusion. It is simple and easy to operate, and the long-term effect is satisfactory.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the neoadventitia technique for root repair in acute type A aortic dissection(ATAAD).Methods:From January 2019 to February 2022, a total of 94 patients with ATAAD who underwent surgical treatment in Beijing Anzhen Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different treatment methods for the aortic root, the patients were divided into the neoadventitia technique group(58 cases) and the Bentall group(36 cases). The perioperative data and postoperative follow-up results of the two groups were compared, and the efficacy of the new adventitia technique in acute type A aortic dissection was analyzed.Results:There were no intraoperative deaths. The 30-day mortality was 3.4% and 5.6% in the neoadventitia group and Bentall group, respectively ( P=0.636). The cardiopulmonary bypass time[(154.3±29.8)min, P<0.001] and aortic clamp time[(94.7±20.6)min, P<0.001)]were significantly shorter in the neoadventitia group, compared with the Bentall group. Aortic regurgitation was significantly improved after the operation (0.33±0.50 vs. 1.02±0.80, P<0.001). No aortic root-related secondary intervention occurred during follow-up. There was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups( P=0.248). Conclusion:Neoadventitia root repair is a safe and feasible method for the treatment of ATAAD, which has good short-term and mid-term efficacy.
ABSTRACT
The frozen elephant trunk technique (FET) for the treatment of acute aortic dissection is associated with more favorable remodeling in the descending aorta compared to those patients without FET, but it may also be associated with postoperative spinal cord injury (SCI) and actually,some postoperative SCI cases after FET are reported. Several risk factors for SCI are known and one of them is due to the occlusion of intercostal arteries from false lumen. A 71-year-old woman underwent total arch replacement with FET, but after surgery, she noticed decreased movement in both lower extremities and was suspected of postoperative paraplegia. She went through cerebrospinal fluid drainage but didn't get better at all. According to the preoperative contrast computed tomography images, seven out of ten intercostal arteries were originating from the false lumen and six of them were occluded after surgery. When most of intercostal arteries are originating from the false lumen and there is no entry inside the descending and abdominal aorta, the intercostal arteries may be occluded due to thrombosis of the false lumen and it may cause spinal cord ischemia after surgery.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To report our clinical experience and outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for acute Stanford type A dissection using ascending aorta replacement combined with implantation of a fenestrated stent-graft of the entire aortic arch through a minimally invasive technique. Methods From 2016 to 2020 in our hospital, 24 patients (17 males and 7 females, aged 45-72 years) with complicated Stanford type A aortic dissection, underwent replacement of the proximal ascending aorta with TEVAR. None of the patients with dissection involved the three branches of the superior arch, and all patients were replaced with artificial blood vessels of the ascending aorta under non-hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass, preserving the arch and the three branches above the arch, and individualized stent graft fenestration. Results Surgical technical success rate was 100.0%. There was no intraoperative complication or evidence of endo-leak in 1 month postoperatively. Hospital stay was 10±5 d. During postoperative follow-up, the stent was unobstructed without displacement, the preserved branch of the aortic arch was unobstructed, and the true lumen of the descending aorta was enlarged. Conclusion This hybrid technique by using TEVAR with fenestrated treatment is a minimally invasive and effective method to treat high-risk patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the preoperative ascending aorta diameter in patients with acute type A aortic dissection in the Chinese population, compares and analyze the differences in preoperative blood biomarkers, and evaluate the impact of the preoperative ascending aorta diameter in this part of patients on the short-term prognosis of patients.Methods:A collection of 641 patients with acute type A aortic dissection who were enrolled in the " Acute Aortic Syndrome High-Risk Early Warning and Intervention Study" project from January 2018 to January 2020 were collected. Divide the patients into two groups (group Ⅰ<55 mm, group Ⅱ≥55 mm) according to the preventive intervention value of ascending aorta diameter recommended by the guideline for studying preoperative ascending aorta diameter difference in blood biomarkers and the influence of ascending aorta diameter on the short-term prognosis of patients. All patients had CT scans to assess the diameter of the ascending aorta before operation.Results:In this study, all patients with acute type A aortic dissection had a mean preoperative ascending aorta diameter of (46.9±9.7)mm. The preoperative ascending aorta diameter of all patients was less than 55 mm, accounted for 84.1%. Male patients were more likely to have aortic dissection than females; most patients' age was less than 60 years old. The preoperative blood inflammatory index counts were higher in the ascending aorta diameter ≥55 mm group. However, the long-term prognosis of patients with different ascending aorta diameters before surgery was not apparent in this study. The preoperative survival rate and short-term survival rate of patients with ascending aorta diameter <55 mm were higher than those of other groups, but the difference was not statistically significant.Conclusion:In patients with acute type A aortic dissection, the diameter of the ascending aorta is usually less than 55 mm. Moreover, the blood inflammatory index counts are high in the preoperative ascending aorta diameter ≥55 mm group. Meanwhile, patients with smaller ascending aorta diameter have better survival rate and short-term prognosis.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of arch-clamping technique in Sun’s procedure to repair acute type A aortic dissection.Methods:20 consecutive patients[17 males with mean age of (49.7±10.9)years old] with acute type A aortic dissection who underwent total arch replacement and frozen elephant trunk implantation (TAR+ FET) from May 2019 to April 2020 were divided into group with using arch-clamping technique during operation (arch-clamping group) or group without (traditional group). Circulatory arrest time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, recovery time, ventilation time, platelet count during the first 3 days postoperatively, blood loss during the first 12 h postoperatively, death, cerebral infarction and acute renal failure were compared. Patients with advanced age(age>70 years old ), or malperfusion syndrome preoperatively or who did not receiving TAR+ FET surgery were excluded from this study.Results:Circulatory arrest time[(4.1±0.6 )min vs. (17.2±2.6)min, P=0.001] and cardiopulmonary bypass time[(158.4±6.8 )min vs. (198.2±12.6)min, P=0.01] were significantly lower in arch-clamping group, compared with traditional group. Postoperative recovery time[(8.9±2.6 )h vs. (16.0±7.3)h, P=0.94] and ventilation time[(13.6±2.2)h vs. (34.1±14.3)h, P=0.18] were non significantly lower in arch-clamping group. Although postoperative platelet counts were higher in arch-clamping group during the first three days, those difference did not reach statistical significance ( P>0.05). All patients were discharged alive. There was no significant difference among the two group with respect to drainage during the first 12 h postoperatively, death, cerebral infarction and acute renal failure. Conclusion:Arch-clamping technique decrease circulatory arrest time dramatically and provide good protection of brain, coagulation and renal function by shortening ischemia time, thereby reducing postoperative complications. It is a safe and feasible innovative approach to effectively improve surgical outcome of Sun’s procedure for repair of acute type A aortic dissection.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To evaluate the outcomes of aortic root repair in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with aortic sinus involvement.Methods:The clinical data of patients with ATAAD involving the aortic sinus and an aortic root diameter of ≤45 mm who were treated from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2016, were collected. Patients were divided into group A (involvement of one aortic sinus or part of one aortic sinus) and group B (involvement of more than one aortic sinus). The effectiveness of aortic root repair in ATAAD with sinus involvement was analyzed by comparing the preoperative imaging characteristics and postoperative results between the two groups.Results:The study cohort comprised 155 patients, including 100 patients in group A and 55 in group B. There were no differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics, aortic root diameter, 30-day mortality, and complication rates. During an average follow-up of(49.1±14.6) months, there was no difference between the two groups in the survival rate (92.0% vs. 89.5%, P=0.61). The aortic root diameter at follow-up showed no progressive expansion compared with preoperatively in either of the two groups[(38.1±3.6) mm vs. (37.9±3.5)mm, P=0.92, A; (38.4±4.1) mm vs. (38.3±3.6) mm, P=0.74, B]; furthermore, there was no difference between the two groups in aggravation of aortic regurgitation. Conclusion:Aortic root repair achieves satisfactory medium-term outcomes in ATAAD with more than one aortic sinus involved, but the long-term outcomes need to be evaluated.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To analyse the effect of preoperative renal function classification on early outcomes for patients with acute type A aortic dissection(AAAD) and to estimate the risk factors of postoperative major adverse events.Methods:From January 2012 to December 2019, 226 patients with AAAD who underwent total arch replacement at our institution were retrospectively analysed, including 146 males and 80 females, aged(54.4±12.5) years old. Stages of preoperative renal function were defined as follows: Normal[estimated glomerular ltration rate(eGFR)≥90 ml·min -1·1.73 m -2, 68 cases], Mild(eGFR 60-89 ml·min -1·1.73 m -2, 73 cases); Moderate(eGFR 30-59 ml·min -1·1.73 m -2, 57 cases), Severe(eGFR<30 ml·min -1·1.73 m -2, 28 cases). The independent risk factors for postoperative death were analyzed by logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to assess the efficiency of eGFR for predicting the postoperative hemodialysis. Results:In-hospital death occurred in 24(10.6%) cases. Major complications included postoperative hemodialysis in 49(21.7%) cases, stroke in 19(8.4%) cases and tracheotomy in 15(6.6%) cases. The best cut-off value of the eGFR for predicting postoperative hemodialysis was 36.5 ml·min -1·1.73 m -2(area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.793). The following variables were found to be risk factors of in-hospital mortality in multivariate logistic regression analysis: serum creatinine, eGFR<30 ml·min -1·1.73 m -2, neural malperfusion, bowel malperfusion, postoperative stroke and hemodialysis. Conclusion:Total arch replacement can be safely performed in patients with AAAD and mild renal dysfunction. Preoperative renal dysfunction is a risk factor for postoperative hemodialysis, and eGFR is useful for predicting the requirement for hemodialysis after total arch replacement. The severity of preoperative renal dysfunction could greatly influence the outcomes after total arch replacement for AAAD. More importance should be attached to the assessment of preoperative renal function during clinical risk assessment.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To explore the risk factors for 24-hour death in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients with conservative treatment. Methods From January 2009 to January 2018, 243 ATAAD patients who received non-surgical intervention were admitted in Beijing Anzhen Hospital, including 167 males and 76 females with an average age of 53.0±12.0 years. The risk factors for 24-hour mortality were analyzed. Results The total in-hospital mortality rate was 37.9% (93/243), and 13.6% (33/243) patients died within 24 hours of onset. We found that left ventricular end diastolic diameter [LVEDD, OR=0.45, 95%CI (0.25, 0.83), P<0.01] and aortic regurgitation [OR=7.26, 95%CI (1.67, 31.53), P<0.01] were independent risk factors for 24-hour death in patients with ATAAD. Conclusion In this study, LVEDD and aortic regurgitation are identified as independent risk factors for 24-hour mortality in ATAAD patients. Therefore, patients with aortic regurgitation and small LVEDD should be treated with sugery as soon as possible.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To investigate the application of ascending aorta cannulation and brachiocephalic trunk cannulation in acute type A aortic dissection. Methods We screened 183 patients with acute type A aortic dissection from January 2017 to January 2020 in our hospital. They were divided into 2 groups according to the cannulation strategy: ascending aorta cannulation and brachiocephalic trunk cannulation (a DAC group, n=42, 33 males and 9 females with a median age of 50 years) and the single axillary artery cannulation (an AAC group, n=141, 116 males and 25 females with a median age of 51 years). The general clinical data, intraoperative data and early postoperative results of the two groups before and after matching with propensity scores were compared. Results Before propensity-score matching, the operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic occlusion time and ICU stay in the DAC group were all shorter than those in the AAC group (P<0.05). The early postoperative mortality, and rates of brain complications, renal failure and pulmonary complications in the DAC group were significantly lower than those in the AAC group. After propensity-score matching, the operation time in the DAC group was significantly shorter than that in the AAC group (P<0.05). The early postoperative mortality, and rates of brain complications and pulmonary complications in the DAC group were significantly lower than those in the AAC group. Conclusion Ascending aorta cannulation and brachiocephalic trunk cannulation can provide a safe, fast and effective method of establishing cardiopulmonary bypass for some acute type A aortic dissection patients, and significantly shorten the operation time without increasing surgical complications.
ABSTRACT
@#Objective To explore the early clinical outcomes of patients with acute type A aortic dissection and intramural hematoma. Methods The clinical data of 61 patients with acute type A aortic dissection or intramural hematoma in our hospital from January 23, 2020 to March 10, 2020 were retrospectively analyzed, including 43 males and 18 females, aged 22-81 (52.1±13.0) years. The patient's time of visit, clinical characteristics and early survival were analyzed. Kaplan-Mier survival curve and log-rank test were used for the survival analysis. Results There were 48 (78.7%) patients diagnosed with acute type A aortic dissection and 13 (21.3%) patients with intramural hematoma; 34 patients received operation and 11 were emergent. The 30-day mortality was 2.9% among the patients receiving operation. There were 48 patients alive and 13 patients dead during the study period. The cumulative survival rates for all the patients on postoperative 1 day, 3 days and 7 days were 93.4%, 86.4% and 77.5%, respectively. The cumulative survival rates for the patients with dissection on postoperative 1 day, 3 days and 7 days were 95.7%, 88.7% and 79.4%, respectively. The cumulative survival rates for the patients with hematoma on postoperative 1 day, 3 days and 7 days were 92.3%, 84.6% and 84.6%, respectively. The difference of survival rates between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). The cumulative survival rate of all the patients on postoperative 14 days was 74.5%. No statistically significant difference in survival rate on postoperative 14 days was found between patients with intramural hematoma and patients with aortic dissection (P>0.05). The proportions of the patients with unstable hemodynamics were found statistically significant between the survival patients and the dead patients (P<0.05). Conclusion Patients with acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma who survive to the hospital still have the risk of death under active drug therapy, and rupture of the dissection is the leading cause of death in these patients, especially for those with hemodynamic unstability.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To summarize the clinical experience of cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB) in acute type A aortic dissection received aortic arch reconstruction on age over 70 years patients.@*Methods@#From April 2013 to December 2017, 35 elderly patients aged over 70 who were involved the aortic arch, brachiocephalic trunk, left common carotid artery and left subclavian artery and severe arch lesions, large false lumen and large rupture risk of acute A aortic dissection were reconstructed by triple-branched stent graft in emergency extracorporeal circulation. During the period of cardiopulmonary bypass, selective cerebral perfusion and discontinuous arrest under moderate hypothermia(25 degrees C) were used to reduce the time of cerebral ischemia and hypoxia, and to strengthen the management of the protection of important organs.@*Results@#Cardiopulmonary bypass time was(144.85±32.98)minutes, and aortic cross clap time was(51.82±17.59)minutes, and selective cerebral perfusion time was(12.17±4.70)minutes, discontinuous arrest time was(4.50±3.54) minutes, the lower body arrest time was(16.6±7.49)minutes. All patients were smoothly weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass.35 patients resuscitated within 48 hours, of which 3 patients had transient mental disorders in the early stage and recovered before hospital discharge; 2 patients had cerebral infarction. Hospital mortality in this group was 17.1%(6/35).@*Conclusion@#Advanced age is not a contraindication to the reconstruction of the arch of the aortic dissection. Reasonable management of cardiopulmonary bypass can provide an important guarantee for the reconstruction of the elderly patients with acute type A aortic dissection.
ABSTRACT
Objective@#To find out what the exact impact of renal malperfusion on short- and long-term postoperative prognosis of ATAAD patietns.@*Methods@#218 patients with ATAAD undergoing surgical repair from June 2009 to May 2012 . Mean age was(47.8±10.7) years and 170 were male(78.0%). Based on computed tomographic angiography and laboratory test, 48 patients were diagnosed with preoperative renal malperfusion(22.0%). Clinical data were compared between two groups and risk factors for short- and long-term mortality identified using Cox regression.@*Results@#Patients with renal malperfusion showed significantly higher incidences of short-term mortality(22.9% vs 8.3%, P=0.023), long-term mortality(87.0% vs 72.9%, P=0.003) and postoperative acute kidney failure(20.8% vs 4.1%, P<0.001). Renal malperfusion was the risk factor for short-term mortality(OR 2.92, 95%CI 1.31-6.63, P=0.009) and long-term mortality(OR 2.56, 95%CI 1.32-4.94, P=0.005).@*Conclusion@#Renal malperfusion significantly increases the postoperative risk of short-term mortality, long-term mortality and incidence of postoperative acute renal failure in patients with ATAAD.
ABSTRACT
Objective To find out what the exact impact of renal malperfusion on short- and long-term postoperative prognosis of ATAAD patietns. Methods 218 patients with ATAAD undergoing surgical repair from June 2009 to May 2012 . Mean age was(47.8 ±10.7) years and 170 were male(78.0％). Based on computed tomographic angiography and laboratory test, 48 patients were diagnosed with preoperative renal malperfusion(22. 0％). Clinical data were compared between two groups and risk factors for short-and long-term mortality identified using Cox regression. Results Patients with renal malperfu-sion showed significantly higher incidences of short-term mortality(22. 9％ vs 8. 3％, P =0. 023), long-term mortality (87. 0％ vs 72. 9％, P=0. 003) and postoperative acute kidney failure(20. 8％ vs 4. 1％, P<0. 001). Renal malperfusion wastheriskfactorforshort-termmortality(OR2.92,95％CI1.31-6.63,P=0.009) andlong-termmortality(OR2.56, 95％CI 1. 32-4. 94, P=0. 005). Conclusion Renal malperfusion significantly increases the postoperative risk of short-term mortality, long-term mortality and incidence of postoperative acute renal failure in patients with ATAAD.
ABSTRACT
Objective To summarize the clinical experience of cardiopulmonary bypass( CPB) in acute type A aortic dis-section received aortic arch reconstruction on age over 70 years patients. Methods From April 2013 to December 2017, 35 elderly patients aged over 70 who were involved the aortic arch, brachiocephalic trunk, left common carotid artery and left sub-clavian artery and severe arch lesions, large false lumen and large rupture risk of acute A aortic dissection were reconstructed by triple-branched stent graft in emergency extracorporeal circulation. During the period of cardiopulmonary bypass, selective cere-bral perfusion and discontinuous arrest under moderate hypothermia(25 degrees C) were used to reduce the time of cerebral is-chemia and hypoxia, and to strengthen the management of the protection of important organs. Results Cardiopulmonary by-pass time was(144.85 ±32.98)minutes, and aortic cross clap time was(51.82 ±17.59)minutes, and selective cerebral per-fusion time was(12.17 ±4.70)minutes, discontinuous arrest time was(4.50 ±3.54) minutes, the lower body arrest time was (16. 6 ± 7. 49) minutes. All patients were smoothly weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass. 35 patients resuscitated within 48 hours, of which 3 patients had transient mental disorders in the early stage and recovered before hospital discharge;2 patients had cerebral infarction. Hospital mortality in this group was 17. 1％(6/35). Conclusion Advanced age is not a contraindica-tion to the reconstruction of the arch of the aortic dissection. Reasonable management of cardiopulmonary bypass can provide an important guarantee for the reconstruction of the elderly patients with acute type A aortic dissection.
ABSTRACT
A 76-year-old man who suffered from consistent back pain was admitted for anti-hypertensive therapy to strictly manage the early thrombosed acute type A aortic dissection (AAAD). On admission, his blood pressure could not be controlled well ; soon he complained of recurrent severe back pain. The second thoracoabdominal enhanced computed tomography revealed the progression of AAAD from DeBakey type II to type I with thrombosed pseudolumen at the descending thoracic aorta ; therefore, emergent surgical intervention by primary central repair was conducted. Paraplegia was diagnosed eight hours after surgery, then cerebrospinal fluid drainage and intravenous administration of Naloxone were started immediately followed by keeping the systemic blood pressure more than 120 mmHg. However, paraplegia had never improved and been persistent with neurological deficit of the lower extremities. We herein report a complicated surgical case of an AAAD patient with paraplegia and review the complex clinical settings.
ABSTRACT
Objective To retrospectively analyze perioperative and early outcomes after Sun's procedure of type A aortic dissection patients with different tear size ratia.Methods To retrospectively analyze the general information of 120 patients with acute Stanford type A aortic dissectiontreatedin our center from November 2014 to December 2016.Patients were divided into three group according to proximal and distal tear sizeratio(PDTSR):35 patients in Group A(PDTSR≥2),44 patients in Group B (1/2 ＜ PDTSR ＜ 2)and 41 patients in Group C (PDTSR ≤ 1/2).Retrospectively reviewed the data of perioperativeand follow-up period.Results Preoperative mortality was significantly higher in Group A (37.1％ vs.2.3％ vs.2.4％;P ＜ 0.001).Preoperative morbidity higher in Group A,but there was no significant difference.Ventilator support of duration ＞ 5 days in Group A is significantly higher in Group A (P =0.006).Three-month closure rate of false lumen was higher in Group A (85.0％ vs.65.0％ vs.72.7 ％,P =0.263).Proximal tear significantly larger than distal tear was found associated with preoperative death in logistic regression analysis.Conclusion Acute type A aortic dissection patients with larger proximal tear size need more urgent surgery to fix the dissection.Sun's procedure was an effective way to cure type A aortic dissection,while patients with relatively larger distal tears need more strict postoperative follow-up.
ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the impact of perioperative mild hypothermia on the neurological function and prog-nosis of patients with acute type A aortic dissection. Methods This study enrolled 65 patients with acute aortic dissection un-derwent surgery during the period of February 2017 to February 2018 and randomly divided them into mild hypothermia group and control group. After the process of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest,patients in the mild hypothermia group were re-warmed to 34 ℃ - 35 ℃ and maintained until 24 h after the operation. While,the patients in the control group were rewarmed to 36 ℃ and were treated with routine rewarm therapy. Baseline characteristics were recorded before the operation and neuro-logical and prognosis related indexes were recorded after the operation for all the patients. At the same time,peripheral venous bloods of all the patients were collected preoperatively and at 1、6、 12 and 24 h after the operation. Serum S 100β and neuron-specific enolase(NSE)levels were measured by ELISA kit. Results Compared with the control group,patients in the mild hypothermia group had a significantly shorter recovery time[ 10. 6 h(IQR:7. 6, 19. 1)vs. 25. 8 h(IQR: 13. 3,54. 2),P =0. 007]. At the same time,serum levels of NSE at 1 h and 6 h after operation and serum levels of S 100β levels at 1、6、 12 and 24 h after operation in the mild hypothermia group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P < 0. 05). In addi-tion,the length of stay in the mild hypothermia group was significantly shorter than that in the control group[ 19 days(IQR: 17, 23)vs. 24 days(IQR: 17,28),P = 0. 036]. However,there was no statistically difference in the incidence of delirium and cerebrovascular accidents between the two groups. Conclusion Perioperative mild hypothermia therapy can significantly re-duce brain cell damage in the patients with acute type A aortic dissection and can shorten postoperative recovery time and hospi-talization time,and thus improve the prognosis of patients.